Sr. Vassa: There's no ontological impediment to priestesses
Is the male-only priesthood a discipline or essential to the nature of being a priest? Sr. Vassa (again unflinchingly taking up a contentious topic by climbing up the ladder to the highest platform and then jumping into the deep end head first) dives right in and says there is no reason beyond personal preference to not have female clergy. You know, when people ask me about women in priesthood, they say, 'Sister, why can't women be priests?' And I say, 'Women CAN be priests. We don't WANT them to be priests.' Because you see, God can do anything, and the Church, by divine authority, uh, can do anything, but, the Church doesn't want to - and that's a legitimate reason. What I don't like is when we TRY to pretend that there are other reasons for this, because it's legitimate not to want something, and there are reasons not to want this - right? - but, we shouldn't pretent that there's some... reason, that, for example, the maleness...
Indeed. Kyrie eleison.
ReplyDeleteVietnam all over again. We never should have invaded the Middle East under false pretenses, every empire that has tried to occupy it has left bloodied and drained, but now there will be tragedy no matter what we do, stay or leave.
ReplyDeleteLord , have mercy on all of us.
ReplyDeleteAren't there thousands of young Afghanis willing to fight and die for their beloved homeland??!! I guess not. 🤔👀
ReplyDeleteYes there are. They are called the Taliban.
ReplyDeleteWhy must Afaghans run away from fellow Afaghans?
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete